Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Good article from Mish, Taxpayer takes a huge loss!!

I am changing my tune. Geithner's plan can succeed. Before anyone collapses on the floor or starts screaming that I have lost my mind, it's important to define what success means and what the plan is.What Success Is Not Getting banks to lend.
Having a fair bidding process.
Arriving at a fair market value of bank assets.The first is not going to happen and it would be a bad thing if it did, even though Geithner is foolish enough to actually want that. Rather the idea is to make it appear as if there is a fair bidding process so that a fair market value of bank assets can be determined.The key word in the above sentence is appear.Geithner does not want a fair bidding process, nor does he want to arrive at a fair market value of assets. Rather, Geithner does want to avoid a hit to bondholders, at seemingly any taxpayer cost.Putting Off Hard ChoicesOn March 23, John Hussman discussed the bondholder writeoff situation in Fed and Treasury - Putting off Hard Choices with Easy Money (and Probable Chaos).
From early reports regarding the toxic assets plan, it appears that the Treasury envisions allowing private investors to bid for toxic mortgage securities, but only to put up about 7% of the purchase price, with the TARP matching that amount - the remainder being "non-recourse" financing from the Fed and FDIC. This essentially implies that the government would grant bidders a put option against 86% of whatever price is bid. This is not only an invitation for rampant moral hazard, as it would allow the financing of largely speculative and inefficiently priced bids with the public bearing the cost of losses, but of much greater concern, it is a likely recipe for the insolvency of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and represents a major end-run around Congress by unelected bureaucrats.Make no mistake - we are selling off our future and the future of our children to prevent the bondholders of U.S. financial corporations from taking losses. We are using public funds to protect the bondholders of some of the most mismanaged companies in the history of capitalism, instead of allowing them to take losses that should have been their own. All our policy makers have done to date has been to squander public funds to protect the full interests of corporate bondholders. Even Bear Stearns' bondholders can expect to get 100% of their money back, thanks to the generosity of Bernanke, Geithner and other bureaucrats eager to hand out the money of ordinary Americans.I do not agree with Hussman's views on inflation, but he is always a great read. Please read the above article because protecting bondholders at any expense is indeed part of the plan.Abandoning Toxic Asset PurchasesOn March 30, Hussman did a followup on Abandoning Toxic Asset Purchases.
Gross private debt currently stands at about 350% of GDP, about double the historical norm. Meanwhile, many of the assets underlying this debt are being marked down in value by 20-30% or more. Given that GDP itself is about $14 trillion, a continued policy of bailouts will eventually require a commitment of public funds amounting to a significant fraction of $14 trillion.The Treasury's proposal to address insolvency is to finance the purchase of impaired assets from the banks, primarily using taxpayer funds. But note that if the questionable assets are taken off of the bank's books at their actual value, there is absolutely no change on the liability side of the balance sheet. The bank's capital position does not improve. The “toxic asset sale” simply replaces the bad assets with cash. While this might improve the “quality” of the bank's balance sheet, it does not make the institution solvent.Indeed, the only way for the toxic asset sale to increase shareholder equity is if the buyer overpays for the asset. To accomplish this, the Geithner plan creates a speculative incentive for private investors, by effectively offering them a “put option,” whereby taxpayers would absorb all losses in excess of 3-7% of the purchase amount. This is essentially a recipe for the insolvency of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation itself, which would provide the bulk of the “6-to-1 leverage.” To the extent that it is not acceptable for the FDIC to fail, the Geithner plan implies an end-run around Congress, and would ultimately force the provision of funds to cover probable losses.An equal concern is that there is no link between removing “toxic assets” from bank balance sheets and avoiding large-scale home foreclosures and loan defaults. All the transaction accomplishes is to take the assets out of the bank's hands, to offer half of any speculative gains to private “investors,” and to leave the public at risk for 93-97% of the probable losses. What the plan emphatically does not do is to affect the payment obligations of homeowners in a way that would reduce the likelihood of foreclosure. Moreover, the last thing that a bank would do with the proceeds would be to refinance such mortgages, because that would provide full repayment to the original lenders while taking on the risk of the newly refinanced loans.The Real PlanHere is the real plan that now seems odds on to succeed.The Plan: Dump $500 billion of toxic assets on to unsuspecting taxpayers via a public-private partnership in which 93% of the losses are born by the taxpayer. This is not a new revelation, there have been many articles on that theme over the past week. However, most missed the corporate bond connection.InterfluiditySteve Waldman is another one who caught the corporate bond connection in Dark Musings.
I am filled with despair, not because what we are doing cannot "work", but because it is too unjust. This is not my country.I think that critics of the Geithner plan are missing some of its tactical brilliance. My guess is that behind the scenes, Geithner has arranged a kind of J.P. Morgan moment.I don't think the scandal of the Geithner plan is going to turn out to be the subsidy to well-connected investors embedded in the non-recourse loan put option. On the contrary, I think that Treasury has already lined up participants for the "Legacy Loans Public-Private Investment Fund" and persuaded them to offer prices so high that despite the put, investors will expect to take a major loss. My little conspiracy theory is that the Blackrocks and PIMCOs of the world, the asset managers who do well by "shaking hands with the government", will agree to take a hit on relatively small investments in order first to help make banks smell solvent, and then to compel and provide "good optics" for a maximal transfer from government to key financial institutions.Why would PIMROCK go along with this? Because they feel it is their patriotic duty to work with the government for the good of the financial system, even if that involves accepting some sacrifices. And because they hold $100B in J.P. Citi of America bonds, and they've received assurances that if we can get the nation out of the financial pickle it's in, there will be no haircuts on those bonds. "Shaking hands with the government" means that nothing ever has to be put in writing.Welcome to America, 2009. Change we can believe in.How The Plan "Works"Nouriel RoubiniNouriel Roubini asks The Public-Private Partnership Investment Program (PPIP) – Will It Work?
The theoretical foundations of Geithner’s plan are provided by Lucian Bebchuk from Harvard University among others. He explains that “if the underlying market failure is at least partly one of liquidity, an effective plan for a public-private partnership in buying troubled assets can be designed. The key is to have competition at two levels.Geithner’s plan seems to follow these guidelines to a large degree. In particular, on the one hand the government subsidy allows private investors to bid a higher price than otherwise warranted (i.e. the government gives investors the equivalent of a call option.) On the other hand, the fact that the private investor is bound to lose its entire equity stake if the asset value deteriorates from artificially high valuations provides an incentive to bid conservatively. Both effects together may contribute to a reasonable level of price discovery.We can quickly dismiss the idea of a "reasonable level of price discovery".

Videos of the math of the Geithner Plan:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ervHbKa7R5g&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-arbfLTCtI

Quantitive Easing, Didn't work in Japan?



Spend our way out! This policy won't work and punishes savers. This monetary policy doesn't make sense. I wish the government would allow me to borrow at .25% and then go out and buy 10-year notes at 2.5%, thus earning a 2% risk free return. Like I really believe that Ben Bernacke is going to buy up enough Treasury securities to move 10-year note rates below 2% and force banks to lend money to borrowers who can't possibly pay them back.
No instead, the middle class gets taxed to death, pays too much interest, and gets killed silently by inflation. We will have low interest rates for a couple of years and inflation will eat our purchasing power and savings away. Japan taught us very little and the deflationary depression will run its course. In 1990 Japan's Nikkei index was 80% higher than today at close to 40,000. Today the Nikkei trades at under 10,000. Real estate prices in Japan were also 80% higher than they are today. The 1990's in Japan is called the lost decade and interest rates stayed between zero and 1%. Remember in Japan the inflation that everyone says is coming in the US never became a factor. At some point in a galaxy far far away, inflation will rear its ugly head. Probably in a couple of years we'll see double digit inflation, but Japan never did.

This video below explains quantitive easing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FziFyDrQ35M

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Snl-skit-dont-buy-stuff-you-cant-afford

http://consumerist.com/consumer/clips/snl-skit-dont-buy-stuff-you-cant-afford-252491.php

So the government wants to continue the credit expansion? Maybe we should spend less and save more? Maybe we should go back to sound money and get the US dollar back on the gold standard? Maybe banks should be allowed to fail because they made NINJA(No Job, No Income, No Assets) loans to people. The US government doesn't make anyone accountable for their actions. Yes, this country has lost its way and it begins with the decay of family values.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

THE 4 Big Bears


The above chart outlines the 4 biggest bear markets in history. One of which we are currently in and see no end in sight. The current bear market is noteworthy because it comes in the middle of a 25 year credit expansion. I do not expect the S&P 500 index to go down 90% from peak to trough like the 1930's. But I could reasonably see values at 350 or a 75% peak to trough decline.
The Austrian school of Economics has written publications regarding credit expansion and the destruction of the excesses after the bubble bursts. Basically much of what comes during the expansion goes away afterwards. The destruction after the collapse is so great that many people wonder if the credit expansion was worth it. Japan and the lost decade of the 1990's is a perfect example of the end result in a credit expansion gone awry. Credit is an illusion of wealth and using credit is an unwise habit. Past generations used to call people with second mortgages "losers". Our generation called them home equity lines of credit and some how this made second mortgages more acceptable. What we learn from the past is that we don't learn from the past. History always repeats itself.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

GE THE NEXT TO FAIL? I SAY YES!!

GE will have to be broken up and sold off at some point. Casualties of the collapse.
1) Countrywide
2)IndyMac Bank
3) BearStearns
4)Lehman Brothers
5) AIG
6)Citigroup
7) Bank of America/Countrywide/Merrill Lynch
8) WaMu
9) Wachovia
10) GE ....General Electric are you f&*kin serious?????

So you think stocks are cheap?


If history is a guide we've farther to fall. I've told many of my friends that stocks will fall another 25-50% on average. As you can see from the graph above we are currently at a Price/Earning's ratio of 12. (The graph above doesn't reflect the markets continued fall)
After the great depression stocks fell to an average PE of $2-$4 a share. This occurred again after World War II and in the early inflationary 1980's. I think the S&P 500 will go to 300-400 which would mean we have a 43%-57% drop ahead of us. The world will be very scary if this happens. Civil unrest is already happening around the world and expect it to continue. It's time to buy both Gold and Guns!

Monday, March 2, 2009

Time for a Revolution!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REtmym2e3PI&feature=channel_page

Holler at your boy Dilley. 32 states are ready to exercise their 10th Amendment rights. It's time for the people to let the government know who runs the show. The power comes from the people by the people and for the people. The federal government needs to understand the limited powers that they have. The goods coming from China are garbage.